Publication date: March 29, 2021
Simplify | Define Eligibility | Require Support
Confusing Language: Ballot initiative language needs to be simplified so anyone can understand it, and should explain how the new law will be funded if enacted.
Targeting: Petitions should limit the percentage of signatures that may be collected from densely populated areas, and should require a minimum number of signatures from every congressional district, not just two-thirds of them.
Eligibility: The Missouri Constitution should define who is eligible to sign a petition—only U.S. citizens who are legally registered to vote in Missouri.
- Ballot initiatives contain way too much information, leaving voters confused and not really know what they are voting for.
- The Medicaid Expansion initiative was confusing, Voters recalled seeing Medicaid Expansion on the ballot, but were not sure what it was about or if it had passed.
- Voters were unaware that they tried to change the constitution 31 times within the past 10 years, 13 of which were successful.
- There should be some sort of checks and balances on petitions to ensure geographic representation, such as requiring a certain percentage of the voting population from each county to sign on.
- Voters support a daily pay for petition collectors, but want to ban the pay-per-signature model.
- Almost everyone agreed that it should be in the constitution to allow only registered voters who are citizens to sign a petition, and most were more likely to support a candidate who supported that requirement.
- Voters want more information on the ballot, such as the basis for the initiative, who it benefits, the costs and how it will be funded, the sustainability and long-term funding, and where those funds will be coming from.
- Most were more likely to support candidates who supported all of the reforms.
TOPIC(S): Initiative Integrity